Educational research platform

Before you begin

Welcome to Peptide Relay

Explore source-linked research, practical tools, and Community Intelligence with evidence, interpretation, and personal experience kept clearly separated.

Please confirm
Choose how you enter RelayYou can change your mind and create a workspace later.

No account is required for the Research Library, Learn, Compare, Stack Explorer, Community, or Tools. A free workspace is only required for private features such as My Relay, Protocol Tracker, saved work, following compounds, and managing Community Experiences.

Peptide Relay status

Public Alpha

v0.9.0

Building Relay with the community.

Relay is now feature-complete and has entered its first Public Alpha.

From this point forward, improvements are driven by real-world usage, community feedback, analytics, and research rather than internal feature planning.

Thank you for helping shape Relay.

What's NewWhat shipped in the current release
v0.9.0 — Public AlphaJuly 2026

Research Library

Thirty-five source-traceable compound and blend profiles with plain-English summaries, detailed science, evidence context, timelines, and references.

Learn

Peptide 101 and seven cornerstone guides for reading studies, mechanisms, evidence strength, personal experiences, and research uncertainty.

Compare

Side-by-side research context with shared, different, and unknown states—without inventing head-to-head conclusions.

Stack Explorer

Multi-compound pathway and evidence analysis with exact-combination limits and unanswered questions kept visible.

Community Experiences

Anonymous structured Experience Reports, separate story consent, verified follow-ups, moderation, and privacy-thresholded Community Intelligence.

Protocol Tracker

Private schedules, administrations, reflections, measurements, inventory, imports, lifecycle controls, and reconstitution support.

Reconstitution Hub

Single-compound and blend calculations, visual syringe and vial interpretation, reference marks, and private saved workspaces.

Relay-wide Search

One alias-aware search experience across public research and signed-in workspace destinations.

Mobile Optimization

Reliable touch selection, tighter information density, responsive tables and tabs, and mobile-first workflow refinement.

Motion System

One restrained motion language that explains state changes and respects reduced-motion preferences.

Platform Improvements

Database contract auditing, private-route indexing boundaries, public-route smoke tests, clearer recovery messages, and stronger protection against false-success writes.

RoadmapDirection without promised timelines

Roadmap items describe current direction. Public Alpha evidence may change their order or scope.

Now
  • Community growth
  • Bug fixes
  • UX improvements
  • Content expansion
Next
  • Relay+ features
  • Additional research tools
  • Expanded compound library
Future
  • Relay AI
  • Native iPhone app (planned)
  • Native Android app (planned)
Known IssuesMeaningful issues users may encounter
No known critical issues at this time.

Newly confirmed issues will appear here when they meaningfully affect the public experience.

FeedbackHelp improve the next release

Found a bug?Have a suggestion?

Submit feedback to help improve Relay
Version HistoryPublic releases and milestones
v0.9.0

Public Alpha

The first feature-complete public release candidate for Peptide Relay.

Released July 2026

Last updated July 2026 · Updated with every public release.

Compound library

Endogenous thiol tripeptide / cellular redox buffer

Glutathione

Not FDA approved

Glutathione is a small molecule your body makes to help control redox balance and process peroxides and reactive chemicals. People research it for antioxidant support, skin pigmentation, liver health, recovery, breathing conditions, and general wellness. Oral glutathione can raise measured glutathione, but stronger clinical benefits are inconsistent, route-specific, or not demonstrated. Injectable products add sterility and endotoxin risks.

6-minute readEvidence reviewed July 25, 2026
Controlled human studyOther human evidenceMechanistic rationaleNo direct evidence located

Built by the community

Help strengthen the Glutathione experience record

Every structured report adds useful context about research setup, outcomes, and unwanted effects as the community dataset grows.

Publicly anonymous by default. Your account keeps reports editable and helps reduce duplicate submissions.
Educational research record—not medical advice. Evidence reviewed through July 25, 2026. Peer-reviewed findings, regulatory labeling, sponsor-reported topline results, and unreported registered trials are labeled separately.

Research at a glance

Glutathione in 60 seconds

Depth and confidence summarize the research record—not effectiveness, safety, or a recommendation.

Research depthBroad multi-route human record

Controlled oral, inhaled, intravenous, and topical studies examine biomarkers and disease-specific outcomes using very different formulations.

Why this matters

Research depth describes how large and mature the overall record is. It does not tell you whether the results were positive.

Evidence confidenceLow for broad clinical benefit

Oral target engagement is reproducible, but meaningful clinical effects are inconsistent, route-specific, and often unsupported by larger trials.

Why this matters

Confidence describes how reliable and consistent the conclusions are. It can be high for one outcome and low for another.

Strongest evidenceControlled oral biomarker and 153-person inhaled clinical trials
Why this matters

The strongest evidence type shows what the best-supported conclusions are actually based on.

Human evidenceDirect but highly route-, formulation-, and outcome-specific
Why this matters

Human findings are more directly relevant than animal or laboratory results, but they still apply only to the populations and outcomes studied.

Route-specific record

What changes by administration method

Route studiedOral reduced, liposomal, micellar, and other formulation-specific glutathione products
Schedules studiedSingle pharmacokinetic exposures and daily use lasting 30 days to 6 months
Amounts studiedControlled studies used distinct exposures including 250 or 1,000 mg/day for 6 months, 300–500 mg single-dose comparisons, and 600 mg/day for 30 days
Why this matters

These are exposures used in cited research for a specific route and population—not a suggested amount.

Half-lifeNo universal oral half-life applies across reduced, liposomal, micellar, and other formulations
Why this matters

Half-life describes how long it takes the measured amount in the body to fall by half. It is not a dosing recommendation.

Route evidenceControlled human biomarker and pharmacokinetic studies; disease-outcome evidence is mixed
Why this matters

Evidence can change by administration method. Findings from one route should not automatically be applied to another.

Evidence boundary: Higher measured glutathione does not automatically mean better symptoms, performance, recovery, liver health, or longevity. Branded formulations and milligram amounts are not interchangeable. Amounts shown describe cited research exposure—not a dosage recommendation.

Practical starting point

Why people research it

Common goals and questions—not recommendations or promises of benefit.

  • Antioxidant and redox supportMechanistically plausible
  • Raising glutathione body storesSupported by human studies
  • Skin pigmentation or melasmaMixed human evidence
  • Cystic-fibrosis clinical outcomesSupported by human studies
  • Parkinson symptomsEarly human evidence
  • Liver support or detoxificationNot demonstrated
  • Energy, fatigue, or exercise recoveryNot demonstrated
  • Healthy aging or longevityNot demonstrated

The overview, studies, and source ledger below explain what supports each label—and where the evidence stops.

The short version

What is Glutathione?

Glutathione is a small molecule your body makes to help control redox balance and process peroxides and reactive chemicals. People research it for antioxidant support, skin pigmentation, liver health, recovery, breathing conditions, and general wellness. Oral glutathione can raise measured glutathione, but stronger clinical benefits are inconsistent, route-specific, or not demonstrated. Injectable products add sterility and endotoxin risks.

Controlled oral, inhaled, topical, and small intravenous human studies with route-specific and mixed outcomesCurrent development stage
6Peer-reviewed sources
0Topline source releases

How it is designed to work

  • GSH/GSSG cellular redox buffering
  • Glutathione-peroxidase electron donation
  • Glutathione-S-transferase conjugation of electrophiles
  • Peroxide and reactive-species handling
  • Protein-thiol and redox signaling
  • Support of antioxidant recycling

Studied research areas

Glutathione stores and oral bioavailabilityOxidative-stress and redox biomarkersSkin pigmentation and melasmaCystic fibrosisParkinson's diseaseLiver and metabolic healthExercise recovery and fatigueGeneral wellness and healthy aging
Evidence checked through July 25, 2026

Evidence reviewed through July 25, 2026. Direct glutathione is separated from NAC, GlyNAC, cysteine, glycine, glutamine, and combination products. Oral, topical, inhaled, and intravenous evidence are not treated as interchangeable.

What the evidence says

What we know—and what we’re still learning

What we know

Controlled oral trials show that direct glutathione can raise glutathione biomarkers; larger condition-specific trials show that target delivery does not necessarily improve clinical outcomes

Why this matters

This is the strongest supported conclusion in the current human evidence—not a summary of every claim made about the compound.

What we’re still learning

Which formulation- and route-specific biomarker changes, if any, translate into meaningful durable health outcomes and what long-term safety looks like

Why this matters

Keeping the main uncertainty visible prevents an early or promising finding from looking more settled than it is.

The evidence story

How the research changed over time

Importance shows how much an item changes the evidence story. Quality shows how much confidence the design deserves. A strong negative study can score highly on both.

Why this matters

Importance and quality answer different questions. A rigorous study can be highly important even when it challenges a popular claim.

Controlled human studySupports a claim

A Targeted Metabolomic Assessment of Oral Glutathione Bioavailability and Safety in Humans: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

The branded micellar formulation produced higher baseline-adjusted glutathione exposure and peak response than the standard preparation at the administered doses. Thirty-day clinical safety markers did not change significantly.

n = 14Single-dose 24-hour pharmacokinetic periods; 30 days of follow-up with the selected formulation
Human evidenceMixed finding

Glutathione as a skin-lightening agent and in melasma: a systematic review

Small oral and topical studies reported some melanin-index improvement, but effects were variable, not durable, and supported by a mixed-quality evidence base. The single IV study was not convincingly positive.

Literature from the preceding 10 years
Phase 2Challenges a claim

Oral Glutathione and Growth in Cystic Fibrosis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial

Oral glutathione did not significantly improve growth, BMI, inflammatory markers, or the other secondary outcomes compared with placebo. It was generally well tolerated.

n = 5824 weeks
FDA sterile-product alertAdds context

FDA highlights concerns with using dietary ingredient glutathione to compound sterile injectables

FDA investigated acute reactions linked to compounded IV glutathione and found excessive bacterial endotoxin in the implicated bulk ingredient, demonstrating a product-quality risk separate from intrinsic glutathione pharmacology.

Controlled human studySupports a claim

Randomized controlled trial of oral glutathione supplementation on body stores of glutathione

Both oral glutathione groups increased measured glutathione in several body compartments. Larger and longer exposure generally produced larger changes, and levels returned toward baseline after washout.

n = 54Six months plus a one-month washout

Administration and handling

What official research does—and does not—provide

Route-specific published research—not a universal glutathione protocol

Human studies used oral, inhaled, topical, and intravenous glutathione for different questions. Oral studies ranged from single pharmacokinetic exposures to months-long supplementation; inhaled and IV studies used disease-specific clinical protocols. These are study descriptions, not recommendations. Evidence from one route, formulation, or oxidation state cannot define another route's dose, frequency, compatibility, effectiveness, or safety.

Oxidation state, formulation, and sterile quality all matter

Reduced glutathione can oxidize to GSSG, and formulation-specific stability, packaging, temperature, light exposure, concentration, and beyond-use limits cannot be generalized. No FDA-approved injectable glutathione label was located from which to derive consumer reconstitution, diluent, compatibility, or storage instructions. FDA has documented acute reactions linked to excessive bacterial endotoxin in a bulk ingredient used for compounded sterile injections.

Primary-source ledger

Trace every major statement

Primary source

FDA: How to find out whether a drug is approved

Primary source
Primary source

A Targeted Metabolomic Assessment of Oral Glutathione Bioavailability and Safety in Humans: A Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial

2026-03-01 · PMID 41897500 · NCT06345950 · DOI 10.3390/antiox15030354

Primary source
Primary source

Glutathione as a skin-lightening agent and in melasma: a systematic review

2025-06-01 · PMID 39444151 · DOI 10.1111/ijd.17535

Primary source
Primary source

Oral Glutathione and Growth in Cystic Fibrosis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Trial

2020-12-01 · PMID 32960827 · NCT03020719 · DOI 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002948

Primary source
Primary source

FDA highlights concerns with using dietary ingredient glutathione to compound sterile injectables

2019-06-07

Primary source
Primary source

Randomized controlled trial of oral glutathione supplementation on body stores of glutathione

2015-03-01 · PMID 24791752 · NCT01044277 · DOI 10.1007/s00394-014-0706-z

Primary source
Primary source

Inhalation treatment with glutathione in patients with cystic fibrosis. A randomized clinical trial

2013-07-01 · PMID 23631796 · NCT00506688 · DOI 10.1164/rccm.201303-0427OC

Primary source
Primary source

Randomized, double-blind, pilot evaluation of intravenous glutathione in Parkinson's disease

2009-05-15 · PMID 19230029 · DOI 10.1002/mds.22401

Primary source