Educational research platform

Before you begin

Welcome to Peptide Relay

Explore source-linked research, practical tools, and Community Intelligence with evidence, interpretation, and personal experience kept clearly separated.

Please confirm
Choose how you enter RelayYou can change your mind and create a workspace later.

No account is required for the Research Library, Learn, Compare, Stack Explorer, Community, or Tools. A free workspace is only required for private features such as My Relay, Protocol Tracker, saved work, following compounds, and managing Community Experiences.

Peptide Relay status

Public Alpha

v0.9.0

Building Relay with the community.

Relay is now feature-complete and has entered its first Public Alpha.

From this point forward, improvements are driven by real-world usage, community feedback, analytics, and research rather than internal feature planning.

Thank you for helping shape Relay.

What's NewWhat shipped in the current release
v0.9.0 — Public AlphaJuly 2026

Research Library

Thirty-five source-traceable compound and blend profiles with plain-English summaries, detailed science, evidence context, timelines, and references.

Learn

Peptide 101 and seven cornerstone guides for reading studies, mechanisms, evidence strength, personal experiences, and research uncertainty.

Compare

Side-by-side research context with shared, different, and unknown states—without inventing head-to-head conclusions.

Stack Explorer

Multi-compound pathway and evidence analysis with exact-combination limits and unanswered questions kept visible.

Community Experiences

Anonymous structured Experience Reports, separate story consent, verified follow-ups, moderation, and privacy-thresholded Community Intelligence.

Protocol Tracker

Private schedules, administrations, reflections, measurements, inventory, imports, lifecycle controls, and reconstitution support.

Reconstitution Hub

Single-compound and blend calculations, visual syringe and vial interpretation, reference marks, and private saved workspaces.

Relay-wide Search

One alias-aware search experience across public research and signed-in workspace destinations.

Mobile Optimization

Reliable touch selection, tighter information density, responsive tables and tabs, and mobile-first workflow refinement.

Motion System

One restrained motion language that explains state changes and respects reduced-motion preferences.

Platform Improvements

Database contract auditing, private-route indexing boundaries, public-route smoke tests, clearer recovery messages, and stronger protection against false-success writes.

RoadmapDirection without promised timelines

Roadmap items describe current direction. Public Alpha evidence may change their order or scope.

Now
  • Community growth
  • Bug fixes
  • UX improvements
  • Content expansion
Next
  • Relay+ features
  • Additional research tools
  • Expanded compound library
Future
  • Relay AI
  • Native iPhone app (planned)
  • Native Android app (planned)
Known IssuesMeaningful issues users may encounter
No known critical issues at this time.

Newly confirmed issues will appear here when they meaningfully affect the public experience.

FeedbackHelp improve the next release

Found a bug?Have a suggestion?

Submit feedback to help improve Relay
Version HistoryPublic releases and milestones
v0.9.0

Public Alpha

The first feature-complete public release candidate for Peptide Relay.

Released July 2026

Last updated July 2026 · Updated with every public release.

Compound library

Endogenous pyridine-dinucleotide coenzyme / redox cofactor

NAD+

Not FDA approved for wellness use

NAD+ is a coenzyme every cell uses for energy metabolism, redox balance, DNA repair, and signaling. People research it for energy, aging, recovery, cognition, and metabolic health, but most human 'NAD-boosting' data come from NR or NMN—not NAD+ itself. Direct IV evidence is limited to one disease-specific randomized trial and very small metabolism and tolerability studies.

6-minute readEvidence reviewed July 25, 2026
Controlled human studyOther human evidenceMechanistic rationaleNo direct evidence located

Built by the community

Help strengthen the NAD+ experience record

Every structured report adds useful context about research setup, outcomes, and unwanted effects as the community dataset grows.

Publicly anonymous by default. Your account keeps reports editable and helps reduce duplicate submissions.
Educational research record—not medical advice. Evidence reviewed through July 25, 2026. Peer-reviewed findings, regulatory labeling, sponsor-reported topline results, and unreported registered trials are labeled separately.

Research at a glance

NAD+ in 60 seconds

Depth and confidence summarize the research record—not effectiveness, safety, or a recommendation.

Research depthLimited direct human evidence

The direct NAD+ record is small; most broader literature belongs to NR or NMN.

Why this matters

Research depth describes how large and mature the overall record is. It does not tell you whether the results were positive.

Evidence confidenceLow outside a narrow cardiac setting

One controlled disease-specific signal has not established general wellness outcomes.

Why this matters

Confidence describes how reliable and consistent the conclusions are. It can be high for one outcome and low for another.

Strongest evidenceOne 180-person randomized hospital trial
Why this matters

The strongest evidence type shows what the best-supported conclusions are actually based on.

Human evidenceEarly and route-specific; wellness claims remain unproven
Why this matters

Human findings are more directly relevant than animal or laboratory results, but they still apply only to the populations and outcomes studied.

Route-specific record

What changes by administration method

Route studiedIntravenous infusion in the direct human record
Schedules studiedOne 6-hour pilot, four consecutive commercial-clinic days, and seven hospital days
Amounts studiedSeparate studies used 10 mg daily for 7 days, 500 mg daily for 4 days, or 750 mg over 6 hours
Why this matters

These are exposures used in cited research for a specific route and population—not a suggested amount.

Half-lifeA clinically useful intact-plasma half-life is not established
Why this matters

Half-life describes how long it takes the measured amount in the body to fall by half. It is not a dosing recommendation.

Route evidenceOne controlled cardiac trial plus very small metabolism and tolerability studies
Why this matters

Evidence can change by administration method. Findings from one route should not automatically be applied to another.

Evidence boundary: The protocols answer different questions and do not form one universal IV regimen. Amounts shown describe cited research exposure—not a dosage recommendation.

Practical starting point

Why people research it

Common goals and questions—not recommendations or promises of benefit.

  • Cellular energy and redox metabolismMechanistically plausible
  • Age-related NAD+ biologyMechanistically plausible
  • Heart failure from ischemic cardiomyopathySupported by human studies
  • IV metabolism and tolerabilityEarly human evidence
  • General energy, fatigue, or recoveryNot demonstrated
  • Cognition or brain healthNot demonstrated
  • Addiction withdrawal or recoveryNot demonstrated
  • Human anti-aging or longevityNot demonstrated

The overview, studies, and source ledger below explain what supports each label—and where the evidence stops.

The short version

What is NAD+?

NAD+ is a coenzyme every cell uses for energy metabolism, redox balance, DNA repair, and signaling. People research it for energy, aging, recovery, cognition, and metabolic health, but most human 'NAD-boosting' data come from NR or NMN—not NAD+ itself. Direct IV evidence is limited to one disease-specific randomized trial and very small metabolism and tolerability studies.

One controlled disease-specific human trial plus preliminary IV metabolism and tolerability evidenceCurrent development stage
5Peer-reviewed sources
0Topline source releases

How it is designed to work

  • NAD+/NADH redox cycling in energy metabolism
  • Electron transfer in glycolysis, the TCA cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation
  • Substrate activity for sirtuins
  • Substrate activity for PARP-mediated DNA repair
  • CD38 and extracellular NAD+ metabolism
  • Cellular compartment and salvage-pathway regulation

Studied research areas

Cellular energy and redox metabolismAging and NAD+ declineIschemic-cardiomyopathy heart failureIV metabolism and tolerabilityMetabolic healthCognition and neurodegenerationFatigue, recovery, and wellnessLongevity and healthspan
Evidence checked through July 25, 2026

Evidence reviewed through July 25, 2026. Direct NAD+ is kept separate from NADH and the precursors NR, NMN, niacin, and nicotinamide. Product-quality events are separated from intrinsic compound tolerability.

What the evidence says

What we know—and what we’re still learning

What we know

A 180-person randomized placebo-controlled trial in ischemic-cardiomyopathy heart failure found a short-term LVEF signal; it was single-center, disease-specific, and not a wellness or anti-aging trial

Why this matters

This is the strongest supported conclusion in the current human evidence—not a summary of every claim made about the compound.

What we’re still learning

Whether direct NAD+ produces meaningful, durable benefits outside that narrow heart-failure setting and what formulation-specific short- and long-term safety looks like

Why this matters

Keeping the main uncertainty visible prevents an early or promising finding from looking more settled than it is.

The evidence story

How the research changed over time

Importance shows how much an item changes the evidence story. Quality shows how much confidence the design deserves. A strong negative study can score highly on both.

Why this matters

Importance and quality answer different questions. A rigorous study can be highly important even when it challenges a popular claim.

Human evidenceChallenges a claim

NAD+ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence

NR and NMN usually raised NAD-related biomarkers, but functional and health outcomes were mixed and often null or endpoint-specific. The review found no eligible outcomes trial of IV or IM NAD+ itself for anti-aging or wellness.

n = 113Literature search through October 2025
Human evidenceChallenges a claim

Intravenous infusion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) versus nicotinamide riboside (NR): a retrospective tolerability pilot study in a real-world setting

The six NAD+ clients reported moderate-to-severe gastrointestinal symptoms, increased heart rate, and chest pressure during infusions; symptoms resolved after infusion. NAD+ infusions averaged about 97 minutes versus 37 minutes for NR. Exploratory laboratory changes were variable and stayed within normal ranges.

n = 14Four consecutive infusion days with 30-day follow-up
Controlled human studySupports a claim

Effect of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

The NAD+ group had a larger average LVEF improvement than placebo at 1 month. Secondary biomarker, hospitalization, event, and functional-class differences were trends that did not reach conventional statistical significance.

n = 180Seven treatment days; LVEF at 1 month and clinical follow-up through 6 months
Human evidenceAdds context

A Pilot Study Investigating Changes in the Human Plasma and Urine NAD+ Metabolome During a 6 Hour Intravenous Infusion of NAD

Plasma NAD+ and measured metabolites did not rise during the first 2 hours. By 6 hours, urinary NAD+ and methyl-nicotinamide increased, consistent with rapid removal and metabolism of infused NAD+.

n = 11Six-hour infusion with sampling through 8 hours

Administration and handling

What official research does—and does not—provide

Published IV research—not a universal NAD+ protocol

Direct human studies used different IV regimens for different questions: a seven-day low-dose hospital protocol in ischemic-cardiomyopathy heart failure, a six-hour metabolism experiment, and a four-day commercial record review. These are descriptions of study exposure, not recommendations or interchangeable dosing guidance. No controlled direct-NAD+ evidence located here establishes subcutaneous, intramuscular, oral, home-infusion, cycling, or combination protocols.

No FDA-approved reconstitution, storage, or stability standard

No FDA-approved NAD+ injectable label was located from which to derive consumer reconstitution, diluent, concentration, compatibility, storage, light-protection, or beyond-use instructions. FDA specifically warns that food-grade NAD+ is not suitable for sterile compounding without appropriate processing and has documented serious endotoxin-related product-quality events. A powder or solution labeled NAD+, NADH, NR, or NMN must not be assumed equivalent, sterile, stable, or correctly identified.

Primary-source ledger

Trace every major statement

Primary source

FDA reminds compounders to use ingredients suitable for sterile compounding

Primary source
Primary source

FDA: How to find out whether a drug is approved

Primary source
Primary source

NAD+ biology and supplementation: From mechanisms to clinical perspectives

2026-07-23 · PMID 42489969 · DOI 10.1007/s11033-026-12351-3

Primary source
Primary source

NAD+ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: A PRISMA-guided systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence

2026-02-06 · PMID 41655607 · DOI 10.1016/j.arr.2026.103057

Primary source
Primary source

Intravenous infusion of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) versus nicotinamide riboside (NR): a retrospective tolerability pilot study in a real-world setting

2026-02-02 · PMID 41704678 · DOI 10.3389/fragi.2026.1652582

Primary source
Primary source

FDA warning letter: GenoGenix LLC

2026-01-20

Primary source
Primary source

Effect of Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide on Heart Failure Caused by Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2025-09-15 · PMID 40954388 · ChiCTR2200059169 · DOI 10.1007/s40256-025-00764-7

Primary source
Primary source

A Pilot Study Investigating Changes in the Human Plasma and Urine NAD+ Metabolome During a 6 Hour Intravenous Infusion of NAD

2019-09-12 · PMID 31572171 · DOI 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00257

Primary source