Educational research platform

Before you begin

Welcome to Peptide Relay

Explore source-linked research, practical tools, and Community Intelligence with evidence, interpretation, and personal experience kept clearly separated.

Please confirm
Choose how you enter RelayYou can change your mind and create a workspace later.

No account is required for the Research Library, Learn, Compare, Stack Explorer, Community, or Tools. A free workspace is only required for private features such as My Relay, Protocol Tracker, saved work, following compounds, and managing Community Experiences.

Peptide Relay status

Public Alpha

v0.9.0

Building Relay with the community.

Relay is now feature-complete and has entered its first Public Alpha.

From this point forward, improvements are driven by real-world usage, community feedback, analytics, and research rather than internal feature planning.

Thank you for helping shape Relay.

What's NewWhat shipped in the current release
v0.9.0 — Public AlphaJuly 2026

Research Library

Thirty-five source-traceable compound and blend profiles with plain-English summaries, detailed science, evidence context, timelines, and references.

Learn

Peptide 101 and seven cornerstone guides for reading studies, mechanisms, evidence strength, personal experiences, and research uncertainty.

Compare

Side-by-side research context with shared, different, and unknown states—without inventing head-to-head conclusions.

Stack Explorer

Multi-compound pathway and evidence analysis with exact-combination limits and unanswered questions kept visible.

Community Experiences

Anonymous structured Experience Reports, separate story consent, verified follow-ups, moderation, and privacy-thresholded Community Intelligence.

Protocol Tracker

Private schedules, administrations, reflections, measurements, inventory, imports, lifecycle controls, and reconstitution support.

Reconstitution Hub

Single-compound and blend calculations, visual syringe and vial interpretation, reference marks, and private saved workspaces.

Relay-wide Search

One alias-aware search experience across public research and signed-in workspace destinations.

Mobile Optimization

Reliable touch selection, tighter information density, responsive tables and tabs, and mobile-first workflow refinement.

Motion System

One restrained motion language that explains state changes and respects reduced-motion preferences.

Platform Improvements

Database contract auditing, private-route indexing boundaries, public-route smoke tests, clearer recovery messages, and stronger protection against false-success writes.

RoadmapDirection without promised timelines

Roadmap items describe current direction. Public Alpha evidence may change their order or scope.

Now
  • Community growth
  • Bug fixes
  • UX improvements
  • Content expansion
Next
  • Relay+ features
  • Additional research tools
  • Expanded compound library
Future
  • Relay AI
  • Native iPhone app (planned)
  • Native Android app (planned)
Known IssuesMeaningful issues users may encounter
No known critical issues at this time.

Newly confirmed issues will appear here when they meaningfully affect the public experience.

FeedbackHelp improve the next release

Found a bug?Have a suggestion?

Submit feedback to help improve Relay
Version HistoryPublic releases and milestones
v0.9.0

Public Alpha

The first feature-complete public release candidate for Peptide Relay.

Released July 2026

Last updated July 2026 · Updated with every public release.

Compound library

Synthetic cyclic alpha-MSH analogue and nonselective melanocortin receptor agonist

Melanotan II

Not FDA approved

MT-2 is an experimental peptide best known for producing darker skin pigment and, in small early studies, erections and increased sexual desire. Those effects are real research signals, but MT-2 is not FDA approved, long-term human safety is unknown, and products sold online may not contain what their labels claim.

7-minute readEvidence reviewed July 25, 2026
Controlled human studyOther human evidenceRegistered trial — no resultsMechanistic rationaleNo direct evidence located

Built by the community

Help strengthen the Melanotan II experience record

Every structured report adds useful context about research setup, outcomes, and unwanted effects as the community dataset grows.

Publicly anonymous by default. Your account keeps reports editable and helps reduce duplicate submissions.
Educational research record—not medical advice. Evidence reviewed through July 25, 2026. Peer-reviewed findings, regulatory labeling, sponsor-reported topline results, and unreported registered trials are labeled separately.

Research at a glance

Melanotan II in 60 seconds

Depth and confidence summarize the research record—not effectiveness, safety, or a recommendation.

Research depthSparse early human research

Human administration evidence consists mainly of three tiny 1990s SubQ studies, while current development and safety information includes a registered trial, case reports, and product-quality findings.

Why this matters

Research depth describes how large and mature the overall record is. It does not tell you whether the results were positive.

Evidence confidenceVery low for clinical use

No approved product, modern confirmatory program, established long-term safety dataset, or validated retail formulation exists.

Why this matters

Confidence describes how reliable and consistent the conclusions are. It can be high for one outcome and low for another.

Strongest evidenceThree controlled or saline-comparator studies totaling 23 men
Why this matters

The strongest evidence type shows what the best-supported conclusions are actually based on.

Human evidenceDirect but extremely small, short, old, and limited to SubQ research exposures
Why this matters

Human findings are more directly relevant than animal or laboratory results, but they still apply only to the populations and outcomes studied.

Route-specific record

What changes by administration method

Route studiedSubcutaneous Melanotan II in historical pigmentation and erectile-response experiments
Schedules studiedAlternating weekday escalation over two treatment weeks and separate single-exposure crossover studies with six-hour monitoring
Amounts studiedHistorical human studies used 0.01–0.03 mg/kg; the erectile-response studies used 0.025 mg/kg under monitored protocols
Why this matters

These are exposures used in cited research for a specific route and population—not a suggested amount.

Half-lifeA reliable human SubQ terminal half-life was not established in the reviewed studies
Why this matters

Half-life describes how long it takes the measured amount in the body to fall by half. It is not a dosing recommendation.

Route evidenceTiny early human studies plus later safety case reports
Why this matters

Evidence can change by administration method. Findings from one route should not automatically be applied to another.

Evidence boundary: These weight-based exposures came from 1990s experiments involving three or ten men per study. They are not starter amounts, tanning cycles, long-term safety evidence, or validation of materials currently sold as MT-2. Amounts shown describe cited research exposure—not a dosage recommendation.

Practical starting point

Why people research it

Common goals and questions—not recommendations or promises of benefit.

  • Skin pigmentationEarly human evidence
  • Erectile response in menEarly human evidence
  • Sexual desire in menEarly human evidence
  • Vitiligo repigmentation with narrowband UV-BCurrently being studied
  • Weight lossNot demonstrated
  • Sunburn or skin-cancer protectionNot demonstrated

The overview, studies, and source ledger below explain what supports each label—and where the evidence stops.

Loading Community Intelligence…

What the evidence says

What we know—and what we’re still learning

What we know

Two ten-person placebo-controlled crossover erectile-response studies and one three-person pigmentation Phase 1 pilot.

Why this matters

This is the strongest supported conclusion in the current human evidence—not a summary of every claim made about the compound.

What we’re still learning

Long-term and repeated-use safety, actual risk of pigmentary or neurologic complications, outcomes outside small male studies, and whether unregulated products match the studied compound.

Why this matters

Keeping the main uncertainty visible prevents an early or promising finding from looking more settled than it is.

The evidence story

How the research changed over time

Importance shows how much an item changes the evidence story. Quality shows how much confidence the design deserves. A strong negative study can score highly on both.

Why this matters

Importance and quality answer different questions. A rigorous study can be highly important even when it challenges a popular claim.

Phase 2 — registered, recruitingAdds context

Melanotan II as an Adjunct to NB-UVB Phototherapy for Repigmentation in Stable Nonsegmental Vitiligo

No results were posted by the July 25, 2026 evidence cutoff.

n = 60Planned 24-week treatment plus follow-up
Dermatology safety case reportAdds context

Melanotan II nasal spray: a possible risk factor for oral mucosal malignant melanoma?

The report documents temporal exposure before diagnosis and discusses MT-II as a possible risk factor.

n = 1Clinical presentation and treatment
Forensic product-quality reportAdds context

Barbie drug identification: Not a child's play

Reference-standard mass spectrometry confirmed MT-II in the vial, but measured purity was only 30%.

n = 1Single forensic analysis
Safety case reportAdds context

Melanotan Tanning Injection: A Rare Cause of Priapism

The report described prolonged ischemic priapism that did not resolve with initial treatment and required surgical decompression.

n = 1Acute emergency and operative management
Safety case reportAdds context

Melanotan II: a possible cause of renal infarction: review of the literature and case report

The authors reported a renal infarction they considered most likely related to MT-II exposure.

n = 1Acute clinical presentation

Administration and handling

What official research does—and does not—provide

Published human-study administration—not dosing guidance

The 1996 pigmentation pilot used monitored subcutaneous study exposures ranging from 0.01 to 0.03 mg/kg. The two erectile-response crossover studies used protocol-defined 0.025 mg/kg subcutaneous exposures with six-hour monitoring. These are descriptions of small historical experiments—not recommended doses, starter doses, cycles, escalation plans, or evidence for current retail products. MT-2 has no FDA-approved consumer route, dose, schedule, indication, or self-administration instructions.

No approved reconstitution, storage, or stability standard exists

No FDA-approved MT-2 product label or regulator-validated reconstitution and storage standard was identified. Powder, acetate salt, nasal spray, solution, and other seller-labeled forms cannot be assumed interchangeable. A forensic report found only 30% purity in one vial labeled Melanotan II, illustrating why a label cannot establish identity, concentration, sterility, purity, stability, or beyond-use dating. Peptide Relay does not convert vendor directions into official handling guidance.

Primary-source ledger

Trace every major statement

Primary source

FDA: Certain bulk drug substances for use in compounding that may present significant safety risks

Primary source
Trial registry

Melanotan II as an Adjunct to NB-UVB Phototherapy for Repigmentation in Stable Nonsegmental Vitiligo

2026-02-27 · NCT07437560

Trial registry
Primary source

Melanotan II nasal spray: a possible risk factor for oral mucosal malignant melanoma?

2025-03-01 · PMID 40210573 · DOI 10.1016/j.ijom.2025.03.014

Primary source
Primary source

Don't risk using tanning products containing melanotan

2025-01-24

Primary source
Primary source

Barbie drug identification: Not a child's play

2024-09-20 · PMID 39302005 · DOI 10.1111/1556-4029.15633

Primary source
Primary source

Melanotan Tanning Injection: A Rare Cause of Priapism

2021-02-01 · PMID 33460908 · DOI 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100298

Primary source
Primary source

Melanotan II: a possible cause of renal infarction: review of the literature and case report

2020-01-01 · PMID 31953620

Primary source
Primary source

Melanotan II injection resulting in systemic toxicity and rhabdomyolysis

2012-11-05 · PMID 23121206 · DOI 10.3109/15563650.2012.740637

Primary source
Peer reviewed

Effect of an alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone analog on penile erection and sexual desire in men with organic erectile dysfunction

2000-10-01 · PMID 11018622 · DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00680-4

Peer reviewed
Peer reviewed

Synthetic melanotropic peptide initiates erections in men with psychogenic erectile dysfunction: double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study

1998-08-01 · PMID 9679884

Peer reviewed
Peer reviewed

Evaluation of melanotan-II, a superpotent cyclic melanotropic peptide in a pilot phase-I clinical study

1996-01-01 · PMID 8637402 · DOI 10.1016/0024-3205(96)00160-9

Peer reviewed