Educational research platform

Before you begin

Welcome to Peptide Relay

Explore source-linked research, practical tools, and Community Intelligence with evidence, interpretation, and personal experience kept clearly separated.

Please confirm
Choose how you enter RelayYou can change your mind and create a workspace later.

No account is required for the Research Library, Learn, Compare, Stack Explorer, Community, or Tools. A free workspace is only required for private features such as My Relay, Protocol Tracker, saved work, following compounds, and managing Community Experiences.

Peptide Relay status

Public Alpha

v0.9.0

Building Relay with the community.

Relay is now feature-complete and has entered its first Public Alpha.

From this point forward, improvements are driven by real-world usage, community feedback, analytics, and research rather than internal feature planning.

Thank you for helping shape Relay.

What's NewWhat shipped in the current release
v0.9.0 — Public AlphaJuly 2026

Research Library

Thirty-five source-traceable compound and blend profiles with plain-English summaries, detailed science, evidence context, timelines, and references.

Learn

Peptide 101 and seven cornerstone guides for reading studies, mechanisms, evidence strength, personal experiences, and research uncertainty.

Compare

Side-by-side research context with shared, different, and unknown states—without inventing head-to-head conclusions.

Stack Explorer

Multi-compound pathway and evidence analysis with exact-combination limits and unanswered questions kept visible.

Community Experiences

Anonymous structured Experience Reports, separate story consent, verified follow-ups, moderation, and privacy-thresholded Community Intelligence.

Protocol Tracker

Private schedules, administrations, reflections, measurements, inventory, imports, lifecycle controls, and reconstitution support.

Reconstitution Hub

Single-compound and blend calculations, visual syringe and vial interpretation, reference marks, and private saved workspaces.

Relay-wide Search

One alias-aware search experience across public research and signed-in workspace destinations.

Mobile Optimization

Reliable touch selection, tighter information density, responsive tables and tabs, and mobile-first workflow refinement.

Motion System

One restrained motion language that explains state changes and respects reduced-motion preferences.

Platform Improvements

Database contract auditing, private-route indexing boundaries, public-route smoke tests, clearer recovery messages, and stronger protection against false-success writes.

RoadmapDirection without promised timelines

Roadmap items describe current direction. Public Alpha evidence may change their order or scope.

Now
  • Community growth
  • Bug fixes
  • UX improvements
  • Content expansion
Next
  • Relay+ features
  • Additional research tools
  • Expanded compound library
Future
  • Relay AI
  • Native iPhone app (planned)
  • Native Android app (planned)
Known IssuesMeaningful issues users may encounter
No known critical issues at this time.

Newly confirmed issues will appear here when they meaningfully affect the public experience.

FeedbackHelp improve the next release

Found a bug?Have a suggestion?

Submit feedback to help improve Relay
Version HistoryPublic releases and milestones
v0.9.0

Public Alpha

The first feature-complete public release candidate for Peptide Relay.

Released July 2026

Last updated July 2026 · Updated with every public release.

Compound library

Informal two-component GH-axis combination label

CJC/Ipamorelin blend

Not approved

CJC/IPA is a community label for CJC-1295 no DAC / Mod GRF(1-29) paired with ipamorelin. No verified trial of the combination was located. Published CJC-1295 DAC studies involve a different active moiety and cannot be transferred to this blend.

5-minute readEvidence reviewed July 25, 2026
Controlled human studyRegistered trial — no resultsNo direct evidence locatedOther human evidenceMechanistic rationale

Built by the community

Help strengthen the CJC/Ipamorelin blend experience record

Every structured report adds useful context about research setup, outcomes, and unwanted effects as the community dataset grows.

Publicly anonymous by default. Your account keeps reports editable and helps reduce duplicate submissions.
Educational research record—not medical advice. Evidence reviewed through July 25, 2026. Peer-reviewed findings, regulatory labeling, sponsor-reported topline results, and unreported registered trials are labeled separately.

Research at a glance

CJC/Ipamorelin blend in 60 seconds

Depth and confidence summarize the research record—not effectiveness, safety, or a recommendation.

Research depthNo direct blend program

The available record consists of separate-component evidence and a documented absence of verified combination trials.

Why this matters

Research depth describes how large and mature the overall record is. It does not tell you whether the results were positive.

Evidence confidenceVery low for blend outcomes

Different upstream receptors provide a rationale, but no direct evidence establishes synergy, compatibility, safety, or clinical benefit.

Why this matters

Confidence describes how reliable and consistent the conclusions are. It can be high for one outcome and low for another.

Strongest evidenceSeparate-component studies only; none administered the defined blend
Why this matters

The strongest evidence type shows what the best-supported conclusions are actually based on.

Human evidenceNo verified direct human blend study located
Why this matters

Human findings are more directly relevant than animal or laboratory results, but they still apply only to the populations and outcomes studied.

Route-specific record

What changes by administration method

Route studiedSubcutaneous CJC-1295 no DAC / Mod GRF(1-29) plus ipamorelin as discussed in compounding and community use
Schedules studiedNo controlled human blend schedule located
Amounts studiedNo blend-specific human amount or component ratio established
Why this matters

These are exposures used in cited research for a specific route and population—not a suggested amount.

Half-lifeNo human blend half-life; no-DAC CJC SubQ PK is unestablished and IV ipamorelin is not transferable
Why this matters

Half-life describes how long it takes the measured amount in the body to fall by half. It is not a dosing recommendation.

Route evidenceNo direct route-specific combination evidence
Why this matters

Evidence can change by administration method. Findings from one route should not automatically be applied to another.

Evidence boundary: CJC-1295 DAC research concerns a different active moiety, while controlled ipamorelin evidence is intravenous and component-only. Neither can create SubQ blend instructions. Amounts shown describe cited research exposure—not a dosage recommendation.

Practical starting point

Why people research it

Common goals and questions—not recommendations or promises of benefit.

  • Growth-hormone and IGF-1 signalingComponent evidence only
  • Sleep and recoveryNot demonstrated
  • Body-composition changesNot demonstrated
  • Muscle gainNot demonstrated
  • Fat lossNot demonstrated

The overview, studies, and source ledger below explain what supports each label—and where the evidence stops.

Loading Community Intelligence…

What the evidence says

What we know—and what we’re still learning

What we know

None for the combination, and no controlled human no-DAC CJC study was located. Ipamorelin has a 48-person intravenous hormone study; its 117-person intravenous Phase 2 trial did not demonstrate significant efficacy. CJC-1295 DAC findings concern a different active moiety.

Why this matters

This is the strongest supported conclusion in the current human evidence—not a summary of every claim made about the compound.

What we’re still learning

The no-DAC CJC salt and formulation, component ratio, compatibility, combined pharmacokinetics and GH/IGF-1 response, interactions, immunogenicity, repeated-use safety, and meaningful clinical outcomes.

Why this matters

Keeping the main uncertainty visible prevents an early or promising finding from looking more settled than it is.

The evidence story

How the research changed over time

Importance shows how much an item changes the evidence story. Quality shows how much confidence the design deserves. A strong negative study can score highly on both.

Why this matters

Importance and quality answer different questions. A rigorous study can be highly important even when it challenges a popular claim.

Combination-study search auditAdds context

PubMed search audit for CJC-1295 no DAC and ipamorelin combination studies

A July 2026 PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov audit found no verified controlled or registered study administering the defined no-DAC CJC/ipamorelin combination.

Ipamorelin component Phase 2 — not a blend studyChallenges a claim

Prospective randomized proof-of-concept study of ipamorelin for postoperative ileus

The primary endpoint was not significantly shorter with ipamorelin, and key secondary outcomes did not demonstrate significant efficacy.

n = 117Up to seven postoperative days or hospital discharge
Related CJC-1295 DAC pharmacology — different active moiety, not blend evidenceAdds context

Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295 in healthy adults

CJC-1295 DAC produced sustained GH and IGF-1 changes in this small pharmacology program.

n = 6628-day and 49-day study periods
CJC-1295 component Phase 2 — terminated without resultsChallenges a claim

A Study to Evaluate CJC 1295 in HIV Patients With Visceral Obesity

The trial was terminated and did not post results.

n = 192Planned 12-week treatment with six-week follow-up; terminated
Ipamorelin component pharmacology — not a blend studyAdds context

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of ipamorelin in human volunteers

Ipamorelin produced a concentration-dependent short-term GH response.

n = 48Six-hour pharmacokinetic and hormone sampling after infusion

Administration and handling

What official research does—and does not—provide

Separate component protocols are not blend guidance

No controlled human administration study of the no-DAC CJC component was located, while controlled ipamorelin human studies used intravenous administration. CJC-1295 DAC protocols involve a different active moiety. No trial or approved label establishes a CJC/IPA route, dose, schedule, ratio, injection site, or reconstitution process.

No blend-specific compatibility or stability evidence

No published compatibility or stability study was located for CJC-1295 no DAC / Mod GRF(1-29) and ipamorelin mixed together. Separate bulk-material observations or supplier instructions cannot establish blend identity, sterility, precipitation risk, aggregation risk, container compatibility, storage conditions, or beyond-use time.

Primary-source ledger

Trace every major statement

Primary source

PubMed search audit for CJC-1295 no DAC and ipamorelin combination studies

2026-07-25

Primary source
Primary source

ClinicalTrials.gov search audit for CJC-1295 no DAC and ipamorelin combination studies

2026-07-25

Primary source
Primary source

2026 World Anti-Doping Code International Standard Prohibited List

2026-01-01

Primary source
Primary source

FDA evaluation of five CJC-1295-related bulk drug substances

2024-11-15

Primary source
Primary source

FDA evaluation of ipamorelin free base and ipamorelin acetate

2024-09-27

Primary source
Primary source

Prospective randomized proof-of-concept study of ipamorelin for postoperative ileus

2014-10-21 · PMID 25331030 · NCT00672074 · DOI 10.1007/s00384-014-2030-8

Primary source
Primary source

Prolonged stimulation of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I secretion by CJC-1295 in healthy adults

2006-03-01 · PMID 16352683 · DOI 10.1210/jc.2005-1536

Primary source
Trial registry

A Study to Evaluate CJC 1295 in HIV Patients With Visceral Obesity

2005-12-23 · NCT00267527

Trial registry
Primary source

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling of ipamorelin in human volunteers

1999-09-01 · PMID 10496658 · DOI 10.1023/A:1018955126402

Primary source